Thursday, September 29, 2005

The Information Problem

Unlike times in the past, most contemporary problems are not the lack of resources or even resourcefulness, as it is the lack of valid information. In this, those who work hardest, are those with the most to gain from spreading misinformation, by which they hope to create their opportunity. Many even create a problem, even if none existed before. They may even come to believe that their distortions are actually true, particularly if they are successful at convincing many others to believe it so, concluding that so many other people couldn’t be wrong, even if they knew it to be false when they first came up with the idea.

Chief among these are those who propagate information -- which is the media collectively known as the newspapers, television, radio and other transmissions of advertising. But it is not the advertising that is paid for that is the greatest sources of misinformation, but the so-called “objective” articles and commentary of misinformed people or those without the ability to validate information effectively -- a category of folks who in a former era, were known as journalists -- or professional journalists. The entire information game has passed them by.

Such people now, are the most vulnerable to being deceived and manipulated -- because the information game is played on a much higher level than the old journalism could encompass. They have been supplanted by the new information processors -- people whose primary skill is the validation of information, before it is processed for truthfulness. That validation process cannot be done at the end -- it must be done at the beginning of the information process. It is the model of modern information processing, taught as computer processing, or data processing. It is actually a generic skill for processing any kind of information -- and not limited to processing information only about computers, or information processing per se.

That is the essential skill required today for everybody -- and renders the specialized skills and disciplines irrelevant. It breaks down the walls by which experience and knowledge of life has been fragmented, specialized and compartmentalized in the past. While there are those with exceptional abilities and predispositions in certain areas, it is not because they have delimited their field and range of study. The old Ph.D. of the 20th Century, has become a baseline for the well-informed person in the 21st Century.

Today’s generic researcher is capable of accessing quickly what took those in a previous era, a lifetime to be able to learn and access quickly -- but that now is a skill that is largely unnecessary in an era of unlimited memory and storage capacity. It used to be that a primary function of most human beings was to memorize and store information -- which we now realize, is not the highest use of human possibilities. Like a computer, the human is most effective processing real-time information, from moment to moment. If one can do that well, it doesn’t require memory and memorization to function in such a world.

That information is encoded in the very structure of every existence -- and can be examined directly, not as a memorized piece of information but verifiable as truth in the moment, of which there is sufficient processing capacity to do so now. The truth that is only a remembered thing, is no longer necessary, and may be counterproductive, in determining what is essential to know.

The real process of understanding, is eliminating all that is not essential to the task. In many people, that is 95% of what they know.

2 Comments:

At October 01, 2005 12:01 PM, Blogger Mike Hu said...

The Truth About the News

The truth is that 95% of what is presented by the mass media is unnecessary for most people to know; they would be far better off not knowing this information, as many are. It has become a form of entertainment, or preoccupation, with people who have nothing better to do, and the news will consume as much of one's time as one allows it to.

When people really have to know something, the procedure of choice is to search for the targeted information and find it quickly. The mass media mode is to passively allow them to feed information that one does not necessarily want or serve one's best interests, but is the ideal situation for absorbing propaganda. And so mass media has become a mass manipulation, or propaganda machine rather than a source of real information. Unscrupulous people, and they populate the newsrooms all across America, recognize it as their opportunity, because under the cloak of confidentiality and anonymity, it is possible for the mediocre to rise to the top and exclude talent and merit.

And so they attack the competent and enthrone the cult and culture of blame and mediocrity as their rule. There's just not too many takers among the intelligent and competent -- but for these editors, they get to be the big fish no matter how much they have to shrink the pond to remain so.

http://hawaiirepublican.blogspot.com/

 
At October 01, 2005 1:42 PM, Blogger Mike Hu said...

Shakespeare’s best play, Othello -- is about a trusted advisor and confidant of a king -- who delights in sowing misinformation and distrust, so that the king attacks and destroys all he loves, and loves him, for the perverse exercise of this power to control another.

Agatha Christie also recognized this manner of deviousness, and kills off her own hero, Hercule Poirot, knowing that he could never get a court to convict, a mind so devious, that although he never directly committed any crime himself, provided information to others as a trusted informant, that led them to commit their crimes -- thinking they were attacked and persecuted by the other.

George Orwell, himself a journalist, warned of this abuse of power that was possible by “liberals” who begin with good intentions but quickly lose their way. Early on, Orwell was championed by the left as a liberal and a socialist, until they realized, that the abuses he warned of, were those likely to be perpetrated by the left and not right. Big Brother in 1984, is the epitome and embodiment of “political correctness” -- which the newspapers claim to administer.

Finally, Ayn Rand, in the characterization of Ellsworth M. Toohey, in the Fountainhead, describes with chilling accuracy and familiarity, the workings of the authoritarian mind that thinks it his right and duty to speak for everyone else -- and to censor and suppress all other voices to do his will.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home